Posts Tagged ‘facebook’

Facebook’s IPO Is More Interesting Than Just Debacle

May 30, 2012 Leave a comment

Forget about this part for a moment:

Wall Street Hubris Caused Facebook Mess – Zachary Karabell, Daily Beast

Unless you actually bought shares on day one (and didn’t heed Ken Fisher’s classic advice: “IPO means It’s Probably Overpriced”), there are more interesting things to note about the FB offering.

It’s the first ever (that I can find, that also isn’t something exceptional like coming out from under government ownership) IPO debuting bigger than the weighted average market cap of global markets. This is truly amazing—a big cap growth company IPO! It beats Google, it even beats zingers like EDS back in the go-go days.

This speaks volumes about the likely shift in market leadership from small value to big growth and quality, which in my view probably goes on for some time as the bull market enters later phases.

Fisher Investments on Twitter

June 9, 2011 Leave a comment

 As a follow up to the post I did about Twitter May 12, 2011my company, Fisher Investments, recently announced its foray into social media.  An excerpt from the announcement:

 “Fisher Investments is beginning with some of the most widely-used social media platforms, including Facebook, Twitter, Flickr and YouTube. Through its YouTube channel, Fisher Investments showcases a number of videos, including educational clips, market commentary by CEO Ken Fisher, and roundtable discussions with the firm’s investment decision makers. Flickr is a photo sharing site with photos of the company work environment. OnFacebook and Twitter, Fisher Investments streams snippets of content from its MarketMinder website and Fisher Investments Press book series.”  The full announcement from Fisher Investments can be found here:

It will be interesting to follow how other financial services companies, hedge fund managers and the like utilize this relatively new technology in the future. You can also follow Investing IQ on Twitter. 

A Great Tradition

February 24, 2011 Leave a comment

David Brooks in the NYT recently wrote about an ebook that’s getting some buzz: The Great Stagnation by Tyler Cowen.

I read it last night and can’t for the life of me tell why it’s gotten any notoriety other than it’s a first entry in the new phenomenon of shorter books (or, perhaps, longer essays) being published as ebooks and sold for a few bucks. This “invention” is being touted by Amazon and others, and is a good thing—most nonfiction books these days are about 40% too long but editors pad them so they seem more substantial. The essay is the right form for most business and economic non-fiction these days. So I applaud Cowen for being a pioneer here.

As for the book itself, it ultimately amounts to another in a long and great tradition of Americans telling each other how we’ve gone wrong as a society/economy. You’ve got to love it: it’s the hallmark of a strong and great people that openly derides itself. But there are oodles of books out there telling us how bad we are right now, and they’re all mostly myopic to the present moment even if they claim not to be. (For instance, Cowen claims we’ve been on a multi-decade run of decline in creating jobs, but forgets that US unemployment was at or near historical lows for most of the last decade.) Reading this book, you’d have no sense that US GDP is already back at inflation adjusted new all-time highs, that global stocks are ~100% off their lows, or that the US is leading the developed world’s growth right now. To Cowen, we’re not innovating, we’re not really productive— Stuff like iPods and smartphones, Facebook and other social media, though they’re catching on like wildfire globally and were created on US soil, are written off as not really useful for society.

With all due respect to Mr. Cowen, the fallacy of this kind of thinking is easy to see when you realize the basic fact that the US is a developed economy—in fact the most developed in the world! It’s not a matter of “eating the low-hanging fruit” anymore—that’s precisely what developed economies are supposed to do, and we did it very well thank you very much. Cowen compares now to times like the 1890s. Why? We’re a service based economy now, still innovating better than basically anywhere. You’re not going to get huge swaths of folks rising precipitously in standard of living brackets because our country is already way high as it is.

Cowen ultimately offers something of an optimistic view about the far-flung future. That’s good, but if you want to see a more optimistic future, I still contend Matt Ridley’s Rational Optimist is second to none. It’s far better to recognize the most recent recession—bad and deep as it was and still with lingering effects (like high unemployment)—was still an example of the cyclical nature of free economies and markets.

At the very least, as I see it, the continued appearance of books like these among the intelligentsia reminds us there’s plenty of pessimism still out there.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 40 other followers

%d bloggers like this: